A privacy lawsuit against WhatsApp in India over its new data sharing policy has got momentum with the country's top court seeking responses from Facebook, WhatsApp and the federal government. The users also want the option to continue under the earlier privacy policy. The appeal filed in the Supreme Court has asked WhatsApp to stop sharing user data with Facebook until the petition has been heard and disposed off. Privacy groups in the U.S. have complained to the Federal Trade Commission that the changes in WhatsApp's terms and privacy policy break its previous promise that user data collected would not be used or disclosed for marketing purposes. The privacy policy of WhatsApp at launch in 2010 did not allow sharing of user data with any other party, and after Facebook announced its acquisition of the messaging app in 2014, it was "publicly announced and acknowledged" by WhatsApp that the privacy policy would not change, according to the petition filed by Indian users of WhatsApp.
NEW DELHI: In a significant decision, the Supreme Court agreed on Monday to examine whether Facebook 's access to details of calls, messages, photographs and documents exchanged by 160 million Indian users of WhatsApp violated citizens' right to privacy The court sought responses from Facebook, WhatsApp, Centre and Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai), and also sought the assistance of attorney general Mukul Rohatgi keeping in mind the constitutional question raised by two petitioners.Taking on Facebook Inc, WhatsApp and Facebook India Online Services Pvt Ltd are engineering student Karmanya Singh Sareen, 19, and law student Shreya Sethi, 22.In a David vs Goliath litigation, legal luminary Harish Salve argued for the minnows.He said WhatsApp had become a utility service for exchange of messages, calls and documents for a huge population.This warranted a direction from the SC to the Centre to regulate WhatsApp, now owned by Facebook, to prevent it from accessing data created by citizens and disseminated through their medium.A bench of Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice D Y Chandrachud was initially hesitant to entertain the petition.
read more from here
read more visit us whatsapp
collected by :Andro Alex
Indian privacy case against WhatsApp gains momentum
A privacy lawsuit against WhatsApp in India over its new data sharing policy has got momentum with the country's top court seeking responses from Facebook, WhatsApp and the federal government.The privacy policy of WhatsApp at launch in 2010 did not allow sharing of user data with any other party, and after Facebook announced its acquisition of the messaging app in 2014, it was "publicly announced and acknowledged" by WhatsApp that the privacy policy would not change, according to the petition filed by Indian users of WhatsApp.WhatsApp sparked off a furore last year when it said it would be sharing some account information of users with Facebook and its companies, including the mobile phone numbers they verified when they registered with WhatsApp.NEW DELHI: In a significant decision, the Supreme Court agreed on Monday to examine whether Facebook 's access to details of calls, messages, photographs and documents exchanged by 160 million Indian users of WhatsApp violated citizens' right to privacy The court sought responses from Facebook, WhatsApp, Centre and Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai), and also sought the assistance of attorney general Mukul Rohatgi keeping in mind the constitutional question raised by two petitioners.Taking on Facebook Inc, WhatsApp and Facebook India Online Services Pvt Ltd are engineering student Karmanya Singh Sareen, 19, and law student Shreya Sethi, 22.In a David vs Goliath litigation, legal luminary Harish Salve argued for the minnows.He said WhatsApp had become a utility service for exchange of messages, calls and documents for a huge population.This warranted a direction from the SC to the Centre to regulate WhatsApp, now owned by Facebook, to prevent it from accessing data created by citizens and disseminated through their medium.A bench of Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice D Y Chandrachud was initially hesitant to entertain the petition.
read more from here
read more visit us whatsapp
collected by :Andro Alex
Comments
Post a Comment